<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Kirtas official Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kirtas.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kirtas.com/blog</link>
	<description>The Inside Story</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:35:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Why are we digitizing books? by twhiting</title>
		<link>http://www.kirtas.com/blog/book-digitization/why-are-we-digitizing-books/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>twhiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kirtas.com/blog/?p=19#comment-18</guid>
		<description>&quot;Shifting Gears&quot; does a great job touching on a lot of the issues institutions face when it comes to digitization. We all need to find that balance between quality and quantity, access and preservation.

I think we need to take the long tail into account, how might these images be used in 25, 50 or even 100 years from now. I feel its important to capture at a quality level that allows for multiple uses at the back end of the work flow.

There is so much information held in climate controlled vaults all around the world, information that is not readily available to scholars, let alone the general public. I am a firm believer in making all that content available to the masses.

Although access is ultimately the most important outcome, of digitization, without a certain level of quality...the exercise becomes futile. If you can only accurately OCR 80% of the content digitized, you only get part of the story. What if the cure for cancer is out there, just waiting for two or three documents to be digitized, and linked through a data set, and 20%of the information isn&#039;t available to researchers because of poor quality. Our hopes of finding a cure, become that much difficult, or maybe the cure is never found.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Shifting Gears&#8221; does a great job touching on a lot of the issues institutions face when it comes to digitization. We all need to find that balance between quality and quantity, access and preservation.</p>
<p>I think we need to take the long tail into account, how might these images be used in 25, 50 or even 100 years from now. I feel its important to capture at a quality level that allows for multiple uses at the back end of the work flow.</p>
<p>There is so much information held in climate controlled vaults all around the world, information that is not readily available to scholars, let alone the general public. I am a firm believer in making all that content available to the masses.</p>
<p>Although access is ultimately the most important outcome, of digitization, without a certain level of quality&#8230;the exercise becomes futile. If you can only accurately OCR 80% of the content digitized, you only get part of the story. What if the cure for cancer is out there, just waiting for two or three documents to be digitized, and linked through a data set, and 20%of the information isn&#8217;t available to researchers because of poor quality. Our hopes of finding a cure, become that much difficult, or maybe the cure is never found.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why are we digitizing books? by Jill Hurst-Wahl</title>
		<link>http://www.kirtas.com/blog/book-digitization/why-are-we-digitizing-books/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill Hurst-Wahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kirtas.com/blog/?p=19#comment-17</guid>
		<description>What is your take on the OCLC document &quot;Shifting Gears&quot;(http://www.oclc.org/programs/publications/reports/2007-02.pdf) and the ideas of access vs. preservation and quantity vs. quality?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is your take on the OCLC document &#8220;Shifting Gears&#8221;(http://www.oclc.org/programs/publications/reports/2007-02.pdf) and the ideas of access vs. preservation and quantity vs. quality?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
